Who Wants the African
PC Market?
Computer Aid
International (a non-profit supplier of computers to developing
countries), ZDnet UK, and a trio of African universities just
released the results of a comparative study of low-cost, low-power
computers for the African market. Few media outlets reported on the
study, and those that did provided a
somewhat inaccurate conclusion: Asus Eee is more suitable than
OLPC’s XO machine for Africa. Other devices reviewed included
Inveneo Computing Station, Intel’s Classmate PC and NComputing’s
X300.
|
VITAL WAVE CONSULTING
FREE REPORT |
|
|
 |
|
| |
Landscape
Analysis of
Low-cost Computing Devices
This report (with accompanying datasheet) details and
analyzes 93 low-cost computing devices launched or announced
between 2004 and 2008. Analysis includes processor dominance
in various segments and form factors, Windows versus Linux,
device designs, target markets, and leading players.
Download |
|
|
 |
|
|
In fact, the
full report is more nuanced in specifying which solutions are
more suitable for individual users (Asus Eee) and which are better
for school computer labs (NComputing X300). Computer Aid
International (CAI) and its partners deserve credit for raising some
important issues about the African PC market, including
infrastructure challenges that can impact the suitability of
computing solutions, particularly for rural areas. The report’s
emphasis on power consumption and the changes they made to
methodology (e.g., playback of downloaded rather than streaming
video) is necessary for an honest evaluation of computing solutions
for many developing countries. However, some critical issues were
buried or not addressed in the study. For example, the Asus Eee
tested by three of the four evaluation teams was the 701 model
running a Linux operating system, a product that has been
essentially abandoned by Asus in favor of models with Windows XP and
a larger keyboard and screen. Similarly, the report promises to shed
light on the total cost of ownership (TCO) for each of the evaluated
devices, but estimates of critical cost factors such as maintenance,
training, and replacement from theft or damage are not included in
the analysis (see Vital Wave Consulting’s report,
Affordable Computing for Developing-country Schools, for a
thorough consideration of TCO for school computing solutions).
Though the CAI
study is certainly welcome, it is perhaps most remarkable for what
is not said – the competitive field vying for the African market is
pretty thin. Their champion, Asus, has turned its attention to
mature-market consumers, and neither OLPC nor Inveneo have the
needed financial backing to rapidly scale in a market as diffuse and
challenging as Africa. Intel’s Classmate PC (and other machines
based on its reference design) is still around, but Intel’s focus on
the low-end processor market
may be waning. Of
the 5 companies represented in the CAI testing, only NComputing (not
yet one of the giants) seems committed to aggressively pursuing the
education segment in emerging markets. These efforts may not be able
to meet the steady growth in PC usage and private ownership in
Africa. The completion of several large undersea cable projects
could cause a spike in demand for all kinds of computing devices
from Cape Town to Cairo over the next few years as a result of the
imminent increase in low-cost bandwidth coming to the continent this
year. CAI’s study suggests there’s ample opportunity for companies
to step up and meet that demand. |